Sun 15 Feb 2009 |
|
Olivia would understand.
As a result of watching far too many episodes of too many versions of Law and Order, I have become incredibly jaded, desensitized to the viciousness of violent crime, and suspicious of everyone. But that's not the problem. The thing that really gets to me about these shows is that when they search a person's apartment (that's "toss the perp's crib," to you,bub), looking for a piece of evidence-a ticket to Tahiti or a gun, smoking otherwise — they find the damn thing in what seems like mere moments. "What do we have here, Lennie? Looks like the professor is planning a little sabbatical." Or, the exact opposite happens: they don't find what they're looking for — and are absolutely sure it isn't there. "The place is clean, Elliott. Let's take a look at the car." I, on the other hand, am constantly losing things in my own apartment, things that go missing for hours, days, months, years, and in a few sad cases, more than a decade. That poignant phrase, I know it's here someplace, can be heard echoing endlessly through the kingdom. So what I want to know is this: Is there any way I can hire these people from Law & Order to search my crib, er, apartment. Not for tickets to Tahiti (I should live so long) or for guns (I have no weapons except for cooking knives, which are rarely sharpened). Not for any kind of incriminating evidence actually, although that depends on how you define "incriminating." No, I need these people to search for any number of things that are missing in inaction (MII) and that I have all but abandoned hope of ever finding. Some of these items are about the size of gun, or not much smaller, so the cops should have no trouble succeeding where I have failed. Hey, Logan, have you seen my travel iron, last used in 1996? (Mr. Big can toss my crib any day.) Or the travel alarm clock, which probably became MII about the same time as the iron. How about the tape measure that is "always" in the closet in the den, but isn't there now. Or the one remaining hot plate that isn't cracked. (Didn't I have dozens of these at one time)? Or the color photograph -in a frame-that was on the bookcase since New Year's Eve 2000 (a group of us celebrating the Millennium at the Algonquin) that has suddenly disappeared. How about the gold and green eye shadow I used this New Year's Eve? I really liked that. Haven't seen it since the first of the year. And the misses just keep on coming. . . A partial list of what I'd like the detectives to find include a heating pad, a hairbrush, a pair of plastic earring backs, and an extra key for the apartment. And I can never find a nail file when I need one. Yes, those last few items are small, but these guys find things as tiny as hairs and hairpins (DNA! DNA!). Surely, a nail file or a key. . . Then there's the heart-shaped bookmark from Tiffany's. Actually, there were two of them, one traditional and one in a more abstract shape from Elsa Perretti. And the robin's egg blue pen, also from Tiffany's. Okay, someone may have taken the bookmarks and the pen (unlikely, but possible), but who would walk off with that ratty heating pad, or the earring backs? The detectives are also good at finding evidence in the form of paperwork. A suspicious bill from Gun 'R Us, or a receipt from the One Night Stand Motel doesn't stand a chance when they're on the case. Hell, I'd even give them a heads up. Don't bother with the rest of the apartment, boys. Go directly to the den. In the closet you'll find the File Cabinet From Hell and in it, somewhere, are the following items that I'd pay real money to find: •The manual for the Sony TV purchased about 8 years ago so I can figure out how to use the closed caption feature •The list of restaurants in Paris for a friend who's going there this week (I smell overtime pay on this one.) •The letter that was supposed to be attached to my will that specifies that you must all tell a "Pat Story" at the funeral and get very drunk afterwards Actually, I'd like to keep the entire staff (staffs) of L&O on retainer so that I could call night and day for emergencies. For example, to find the envelope I just had in my hands (IN MY HANDS!) five minutes ago (FIVE MINUTES AGO!) and can no longer find. I've searched all over. Retraced my steps. Went back to the kitchen. The bathroom. The closet where I was foraging around for gum (which I also didn't find). The stack of newspapers to be thrown away. My purse, where it had been earlier. Here's the thing: I can't find an envelope that I had five minutes ago, but they can find an important piece of evidence which may or may not exist, may or may not be in the apartment they're searching, and if it is, could be just about anyplace. I realize that there is a difference between Life and TV, but this is ridiculous. I just know that if Vincent D'Onofrio, who plays a detective on Criminal Intent. would tilt his head the way he always does (that man must require serious chiropractic care), he could tell me where - and why -I lost the letter. He knows everything. Maybe I should see a shrink: Am I losing all these things in place of my mind? Because I harbor hidden hostility to heating pads and hot plates? To create confusion so that I don't have to think about real problems, such as why do I watch all those episodes of Law and Order in the first place? Is there a void in my life that I have to fill with reruns? To replace the important things I've lost in life-like my youth? Hell. Where is Doctor Wong when you need him? Or maybe this is a purely practical problem of too much stuff/ not enough space because I insist on living in Manhattan. Since most versions of Law & Order take place in the city, the cops are usually searching apartments, not houses. And that's directly linked to my problem. Although on the surface the opposite might seem true, it's actually much easier to lose things in smaller living spaces. You have no attic, basement, or garage to store things in, so you have to pack everything, densely, in boxes and drawers, under the bed, under the sofa, behind the sofa, jammed in closets and cabinets, high and low, all on one floor, yes, but in a few rooms so crammed with things that you can't bring in a deck of cards without destroying the delicate ecological balance. And yet. I do suspect that there actually is some underlying psychological cause for all this losing of things and searching for things. It must have something to do with sex. What am I searching for that's lost? My virginity? Okay, that's a tenuous connection at best, but I just know that Olivia would understand. I finally found the envelope. It was buried in the bedclothes. See? I told you it had sexual undertones. Or is it overtones? Geez, now I'm even searching for the right word. Those detectives are never at a loss for words. Always there with The Wisecrack. They even feature their smartass remarks in The Case So Far, a little segment that summarizes what has happened up to that point in the story in case some of us are lost. . . Sorry about that; I am getting punchy thinking about all the things I have lost in my apartment that they could find if I were a victim. Let's not go there! Or a suspect. . . H'mm. What if . . .. I became a suspect in a crime. Something I didn't do and could, eventually, definitely prove I didn't do. Would they let me watch while the cops searched my apartment? Would they find the hairbrush? Would they get cranky if I just mentioned the travel iron? Look on the bright side; if all these things are lost within the four walls of my apartment, they aren't truly lost, are they? They're only misplaced. Ergo: I could find them if I conducted a thorough enough search. I know it wouldn't be easy, even though those shows drive me crazy by making it look like it is. Still. What if I devoted a day, or two, or three, or however long it took, to sifting through all the stuff I have accumulated. Would I find anything interesting? Incriminating? Things I forgot I had. Would I get all nostalgic and start Googling people I've lost track of. (You lose people, too, although seldom without a trace. Would Anthony LaPaglia be willing to help? Love his face.) Would I find useful things? Or duplicates and triplicates of things I had already replaced? Maybe, just maybe, I would actually throw away some of the junk and clear out places so that maybe, just maybe, I wouldn't have this problem so often in the future. I did this when the kitchen was remodeled and I hardly ever lose anything in there anymore (except the knife sharpener - and the hot plate). Could this level of organization coexist peacefully in the entire apartment? Would I find the tape measure? And what would I do with all the time I now spend looking for things? Would I write more? Would people laugh? Is that a good thing? Frankly, detectives, I don't have a clue. WHATCHA THINK? Okay folks, am I alone here? I heard Norah Ephron (my hero) say the opposite on Oprah — that it's easier to lose things in a house because it's bigger. Where do you live? In a stately mansion? A cramped studio? The back seat of a Studebaker? Do you lose things, too? |
Blog Roll
- ► 2012 (19)
- ► May (3)
- ► April (4)
- ► March (3)
- ► February (4)
- ► January (5)
- ► 2011 (46)
- ► December (3)
- ► November (4)
- ► October (5)
- ► September (4)
- ► August (5)
- ► July (3)
- ► June (4)
- ► May (3)
- ► April (4)
- ► March (4)
- ► February (5)
- ► January (2)
- ► 2010 (44)
- ► December (3)
- ► November (2)
- ► October (3)
- ► September (2)
- ► August (5)
- ► July (4)
- ► June (4)
- ► May (5)
- ► April (4)
- ► March (5)
- ► February (3)
- ► January (4)
- ► 2009 (58)
- ► December (4)
- ► November (4)
- ► October (5)
- ► September (4)
- ► August (5)
- ► July (4)
- ► June (4)
- ► May (7)
- ► April (6)
- ► March (9)
- ► February (6)
Comments
- I'll Drink To That!
I most definitely plan to vote but it is our choic... - I'll Drink To That!
Just thought that the correlation between greatnes... - OH, SUGAR!
Don't worry, Mr. P. I never count calories and I w... - I'll Drink To That!
I'm going to vote, but not on caffeine vs. alcohol... - OH, SUGAR!
Pat, stop counting grams, etc. Portion control is ... - OH, SUGAR!
And you were eating the cottage cheese because you... - OH, SUGAR!
I see what you mean: there's 3 grams of fat in the... - OH, SUGAR!
This is in the same category of advice as A piece ... - OH, SUGAR!
Do what I do - don't wear your glasses when you ea... - It's No Yoke!
If it ever does, I'm going to document it and keep...
Bitter Patter
Friday the 13th
Came and went.
I bought a lottery ticket
And didn't win.
Reread
THE 13th FLOOR
To remind myself how lucky I am.
WENT FISHING!
Well, eating fish anyway.
And swimming, although not with the fishes in the Uncle Nunzio sense.
Back from the Caribbean.
But don't be TOO jealous:
My tan has already faded.
Besdies, before we left, I had to go through
THE ELEVEN STAGES OF PACKING
Which is not for sissies.
Just got a call from
(Gasp!) the dental hygienist.
Hasn't she read:
A DEVOUT COWARD
GOES TO THE DENTIST
Do NOT Google Santorum.
I warned you . . .
Just as I posted I WAS THE GIRL PHANTOM, I found a website called The Ghost Who Blogs about The Phantom comics:
http://falkonthewildside.blogspot.com
Writing Comics. . .
Was a small but wonderful part of my checkered career, and doing a post about it brought back a lot of great memories. If you know any other women in NYC who wrote — or are writing — comics, tell me how to get in touch with them.
I'm on a watching-old-movies kick these days.
Great way to lose yourself.
If you're lucky, you'll never be found.
REVIEWS TO PERUSE
I'm All Right, Jack:
"Jack" is not just all right, it's totally delightful and fresh as a daisy after all these years (made in 1959), with Sellers, although not technically the lead, giving the brilliant performance that launched him as an international star. He plays an all-too-zealous union leader and father of a blonde bombshell who falls for Stanley, the British Upper Class Twit played, also to perfection, by Ian Carmichael, who you might remember from the Lord Peter Wimsey series. The makeout scenes between the the Twit and the Bombshell are priceless. But what is Stanley doing in this working class atmosphere anyway? Working. And too well at that. Forced by financial circumstances too dreary to discuss, he gets a job in his uncle's factory and messes things up for the other workers by, well, working, and thus making his fellow employees look bad. The film takes a big shot at unions — but also at management: they are manipulating white-collar thieves who'll do anything for a buck. Or a pound. Except for the ones, like Major Hitchcock, played by Terry Thomas, who are just plain lazy and inept. Needless to say, Stanley foils everybody's plans, labor and management alike, to my great joy and delight. Oh, and on top of everything else, Margaret Rutherford plays dotty dowager Aunt Dolly. Delicious!
The Big Lebowski:
What can you say that hasn't been said before: brilliant, inspired, with some of the most memorable lines ever to come out of a movie, the most quoted being "The Dude abides." Oh yes. For anyone who hasn't yet seen the film, and it's now out in a special Blu-Ray edition if that floats your bowling ball. The Dude in question, played to perfection by Jeff Bridges, is an out-of-work pothead who is roughed up and has his rug destroyed by some thugs mistaking him for another, bigger, Lebowski. The Dude is really upset about this because, man, "that rug really tied the room together," which The Dude says with all seriousness and not a trace of irony, a great comic touch considering the condition his condition is in. Oh, and besides "Just Dropped In," all the music is perfect for the film. The plot, according to Wikipedia, which has been known to be wrong, is "loosely based on Raymond chandler's novel, The Big Sleep." Could be. But who cares. It involves a bowling competition, "the occasional acid flashback," a trophy wife, a group of German nihilists, a kidnapping gone awry, a mad millionaire and his lackey, in another great performance by Philip Seymour Hoffman. Actually, they're all great performances. Never a fan of John Goodman before or since, he is brilliant in this film. And so are John Turturro, overacting his little heart out, Steve Buscemi in a nerdy, needy role that makes you marvel at his star turn in Boardwalk Empire, and even the actors in the smaller parts, especially Julianne Moore and Sam Elliott. Elliott plays The Stranger (God? Everyman? The part of us that roots for the bad boy?) who elicits from Bridges the immortal words, "The Dude abides." Which prompts The Stranger to comment to the audience: "Don't know about you but I take comfort in that. It's good knowin' he's out there. The Dude. Takin' 'er easy for all us sinners. Shoosh. I sure hope he makes the finals." We'll never know about the bowling trophy because there's never been a sequel to this 1998 film by the great Coen Brothers, and I hope there never will be. It just abides, as all great films do.
Prince of the City:
Okay, the criticisms of this movie are not totally unfounded: it's too long, and Treat Williams may have overacted a bit, although I found him so deliciously charming I couldn't care less, and there's one part concerning the Jerry Orbach character I just didn't understand. But get over it, The New Yorker, this is one powerful movie. And yes, Dog Day Afternoon it isn't, but what it? The DVD has a great special feature with Williams (I so want to call him Treat) and Sidney (what the hell: I once made a meatloaf sandwich for the man) that explains a lot about filmmaking in general and this movie in particular. Also, Sidney's views on good and evil, and how things are not so black and white as you think. I loved it.
Bad Day At Black Rock:
Recommended on TCM by Robert Osbourne as a film he originally had no interest in seeing, then loved it, and by Alex Baldwin, who pointed out the great actors in the cast, including Lee Marvin, Ernest Brognine and Dean Jagger. Well, after all that, I had to like it, right? I did. A lot. It was a Good Day On My Couch.
Behind the Scenes Stuff: Spencer Tracey was off drinking and wouldn't commit to the film until the producers (who wanted him desperately) told him that they had Alan Ladd, at which point Tracey grabbed it. He was perfect for the part, wearing a dark suit and tie the entire time in a western setting, pulling it off perfectly. Other than that "fashion statement," the film makes a strong case against racism: the hatred of the Japanese during WW2. See it.
Song of The Thin Man:
I usually like these frothy, silly, suave, utter unrealistic films from the 30s and 40s, with William Powell and Myrna Loy as the couple we'd all like to be — if only we had the looks, brains, money, a huge capacity for drinking and a dog like Asta. But this one was a stinker, rather than a stinger, or maybe a sinker, because it turned out to be the last, not to mention the least, in the series. Watch any of the others four sequels, but not this one: Even the pooch jumped the shark.
The Children's Hour:
It had its moments, and just looking at Audrey Hepburn makes life worth living, but mostly I kept thinking that the play, by Lillian Hellman, was so much better. It's about two young women runing a school for girls, who are accused by a hateful little brat of being (GASP!) lesbians. And although the closest we get in this 1961 production to using that actual term is the word "unnatural," it's enough to ruin their lives. A young Shirley McClaine is worth seeing in this, and James Garner, and Audrey Hepburn is, well, Audrey Hepburn. The rumor of the love that dare not speak its name is totally untrue — or is it? And I'll say no more, because you should see the movie for yourself, imperfect as it may be, as is Life Itself.
by martinis alone,
I like this blog:
grapesandgreens.blogspot.com
BITTER PATTER
Click on:
Welcome To My Blog
Scroll down to
PAT'S FAVORITES
for a blast
from the past.





Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post