Wed

28

Oct

2009

BADA BING! BADA BOOM!
Written by Pat Fortunato   
yagotaproblem.jpgThe Sopranos set off a war among the Fortunato Family, as I suspect it did with Italian-Americans across the nation.

On the one side were those who saw it as a good show, well written, well acted, well photographed (we'll get to that later). They watched it every week. You got a problem with that?

Well, yes, yes, I do. And so did my father, and so did one of my brothers, although he ended up joining the enemy (more about that later, too, although the two "laters" are inextricably connected.)

Okay, you figured out that I'm sick of seeing Italians portrayed as goons, who practically eat with their feet (as one reviewer put it), and say things like "fugedaboutit" without the quotation marks. Yes, I am tired of that, although no longer confused as I was when I was younger.

The Italian men I grew up with, my father, dignified but with a love of puns, gentle Uncle Joey, jolly Uncle Ralph, my grandfathers: one handsome and dapper, the other known in the neighborhood for making and taking in large quantities of vino, were nothing like the guys I saw in movies. And the women, my shy mother, my fun Aunt Loretta, even my super extroverted Aunt Rosie (She was Senior Miss New York State in 1998!) would never have had anyone whacked. No matter how cranky they got.

I'd say that I've led a sheltered life, but that's not entirely true. For one thing, I've known actual Mafia types, one in particular who wanted me to help him write a book about his adventures . . . 

And they were, well, adventurous.

But because I'd like to keep my blog, as well as my life, that's all I'll say about that. Except for this: I asked him about Tony's mother in The Sopranos. What Italian woman would want to hurt her son, much less get him knocked off, I wanted to know? My informant gave me one of those "Geez where have you been" looks (there were many of these looks in the course of our conversations) and summed it up in his two favorite words: "It's business."

Ho boy. Well, the book never happened, although the process was very educational for a girl like me. So with the benefit of that experience, I'm not saying that The Sopranos wasn't accurate. Or that these things — like murder, rape, torture, betrayal, and really bad table manners — don't happen. It's just that I'm tired of seeing them happen. Over and over. In practically every movie made in the last two decades

And another thing: Doesn't anyone have a vocabulary that is not made up entirely of the F word, which yes, I do use once in while for emphasis. But once in a while! Not every f---- sentence. (I'm avoiding use of the actual word here not out of prissiness but because I never know what those pesky search engines will pick up and who will block my blog.)

So the thing is, I could see that The Sopranos was well done, but I felt that experiencing The Godfather movies, which I love, own copies of, and have seen numerous times, was enough already. Besides, The Godfather was operatic, and therefore not as realistic — or frightening  — as the TV shows. Tony Soprano in his bathrobe, eating an English muffin, great as the acting was, put me over the edge.

My brother who lives in the South, and is much more laid back than we Northerners are, didn't get why I was so upset. And my other brother, who had the same basic problem I had with the show at first (enough violence already!) is a cinematographer, and when he had the opportunity to read a script and actually shoot a few episodes, went over to the other side. Okay, okay, the lighting is gorgeous, but that left my father and I alone together in our anti-Soprano position. For the sake of family unity, my mother took the fifth.

So now I come to the play, God of Carnage, which I saw today at the Arthur Miller Theatre on Broadway. Like The Sopranos, it had murder (of a rodent, but that counts, right?), mayhem (when the masks of civility strip away, they really strip away!) and if not a cast of thousands, an excellent ensemble of four, including Tony Soprano himself, AKA James Gandolfino –— who, by the way, once voiced his own misgivings about the TV show being too violent. Interesting, no?

Watch for my review of the play in the coming days, unless something happens to prevent it. Things happen. If you wonder what I mean by that , check out The Letter You Can't Refuse at a blog near you. Very near you. Just saying.


SO WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ON "THE SOPRANOS?" ART? TRASH? BOTH? LET US KNOW.


 
This is a threaded commenting system. click [Reply to this comment] for your comment to be underneath the comment you're replying to.

Comments  

 
0 # bluzdude 2009-10-29 02:53
I was also bothered by the portrayal of Italians in the Sopranos, but not so much that I wouldn't watch. I think that kind of ambiguity was intentional on the part of the creators too.

Every time you got to feel warmly towards a character, they would go and do something truly reprehensible. I never forgave them for what happened to Adrianna. (who, incidentally, seemed to be the only one there with a heart.) That's one episode that I just couldn't watch. I heard about it ahead of time and just couldn't look.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Diana 2009-10-29 03:46
I grew up in Queens and my family advises me to take the "Fifth". Besides, violence is violence, and who of us doesn't watch their share of every version of "Law and Order" and most of their perps are sterotypes.
Art is an individual taste, one must suspend judgement. After all, it is television.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Susan Schuander 2009-10-29 04:09
Being a "Jersey Girl" myself, and having spent much time at the Jersey Shore, I never appreciated the Sopranos, thought it too stereotypical and thought it was a waste of time when you could be watching Frontline or something with Bill Moyers, so not Mafia!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Roux58 2009-10-29 04:23
Of course the characters are romanticized and more exciting on the Sopranos...its television. However, I was recently at a personal family event of a dear friend and there, in real life, was a character who out-sopranoed the Sopranos.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Pat 2009-10-29 04:28
BLUZDUDE meet DIANA: The difference between the violence in The Sopranos and what goes down in Law & Order is that you do "feel warmly" towards the characters committing the violence in The Sopranos ? they're the protagonists, after all, the "heroes" in a weird sort of a way. (I have the same problem, in spades, with Dexter, but that's another story.) In L&O, you don't usually root for the serial killer or rapist.
On the other hand, it IS just television, and I sure suspended judgment with Sex & The City. All those shoes! All those men! I so take the Fifth on that one.
Maybe The Sopranos was genius television, as so many critics said it was. And maybe the ambiguity was part of its brilliance. Personally, I couldn't watch it. I don't even want to know what happened to Adrianna!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Pat 2009-10-29 04:39
Oh, Susan: What you must think of me for wasting my time on Sex and the City! But I do love Bill Moyers, too. Honest!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Nancy Lombardi 2009-10-29 04:41
Well said! I agree with you completely on all counts! The Italian-American community is not about the mafia. It's sad that the few bad apples continue to overshadow the incredible accomplishments of the educated, hard working members of the community (who also happen to be honest, law-abiding citizens).
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Anonymous 2009-10-29 04:43
Dear Roux: I think I was at the same event . . .
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Lauren 2009-10-29 04:56
I loved the Sopranos. However, I can understand how the stereotyping of Italians as Mafia goons can be frustrating and insulting to any one of Italian descent. As someone of Jewish descent, I'm particularly offended by the Fagin character in Oliver Twist and continuous stereotyping of Jews as money-grubbing jerks. The same argument could be made about how other minority groups are represented in American culture. Unfortunately, the stereotyping of minorities will never go away. The jokes as well as the perceptions will continue. However, there is good news, too. The intermarriage of people of different ethnic and religious backgrounds will further blend the genetic make up of future generations to come. This will inevitably educate and inform the greater American population that the stereotypes of the past were ill-conceived perceptions based upon viewing the exaggerated nuances of ethnic fictional characters through the lens of a television set or movie screen.

Lauren a.k.a. lauresal (BlogCatalog)
thinkspin.blogspot.com
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Diana 2009-10-29 12:14
Now wait a minute! What's wrong with liking to watch "Sex in the City"? I also like "Sunday Morning With Charles Osgood". HBO and Channel 2 can co-exist just like CNN and Fox. I hate the middle of the road. Pat, do you think any members of Congress read your blog?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # bluzdude 2009-10-29 13:50
I think one of the reasons we see so many cartoonish stereotypes on TV is that they take no imagination or creativity to write. They can just be churned out as if from an assembly line.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Notify me of follow-up comments

Blog Roll

Comments

My site was nominated for Best Humor Blog!

Bitter Patter

NO LAUGHING MATTER:

Did Demi Moore overdose
on laughing gas?? 
That's what's being reported
to those of us at:

A DEVOUT COWARD 
GOES TO THE DENTIST

Have you seen The Artist? Seeing it mentioned at
The Golden Globes reminded me that that not ALL movies are 
Incredibly Loud! 

Do NOT Google Santorum.
I warned you . . .

 I did it!
I actually got that 

LITTLE BLACK DRESS!

How hard was it?
Click on the link above
.

I also got my iPhone.
It's great.
Thank you Steve Jobs
Wherever you are.

  Just as I posted I WAS THE GIRL PHANTOM, I found a website called The Ghost Who Blogs about The Phantom comics:

http://falkonthewildside.blogspot.com

Writing Comics. . .
Was a small but wonderful part of my checkered career, and doing a post about it  brought back a lot of great memories. If you know any other women in NYC who wrote — or are writing — comics, tell me how to get in touch with them. 

I'm on a watching-old-movies kick these days.
Great way to lose yourself.
If you're lucky, you'll never be found. 

REVIEWS TO PERUSE

I'm All Right, Jack:
"Jack" is not just all right, it's totally delightful and fresh as a daisy after all these years (made in 1959), with Sellers, although not technically the lead, giving the brilliant performance that launched him as an international star. He plays an all-too-zealous union leader and father of a blonde bombshell who falls for Stanley, the British Upper Class Twit played, also to perfection, by Ian Carmichael, who you might remember from the Lord Peter Wimsey series. The makeout scenes between the the Twit and the Bombshell are priceless. But what is Stanley doing in this working class atmosphere anyway? Working. And too well at that. Forced by financial circumstances too dreary to discuss, he gets a job in his uncle's factory and messes things up for the other workers by, well, working, and thus making his fellow employees look bad. The film takes a big shot at unions — but also at management: they are manipulating white-collar thieves who'll do anything for a buck. Or a pound. Except for the ones, like Major Hitchcock, played by Terry Thomas, who are just plain lazy and inept. Needless to say, Stanley foils everybody's plans, labor and management alike, to my great joy and delight. Oh, and on top of everything else, Margaret Rutherford plays dotty dowager Aunt Dolly. Delicious!

 The Big Lebowski:
What can you say that hasn't been said before: brilliant, inspired, with some of the most memorable lines ever to come out of a movie, the most quoted being "The Dude abides." Oh yes. For anyone who hasn't yet seen the film, and it's now out in a special Blu-Ray edition if that floats your bowling ball. The Dude in question,  played to perfection by Jeff Bridges, is an out-of-work pothead who is roughed up and has his rug destroyed by some thugs mistaking him for another, bigger, Lebowski. The Dude is really upset about this because, man, "that rug really tied the room together," which The Dude says with all seriousness and not a trace of irony, a great comic touch considering the condition his condition is in.  Oh, and besides "Just Dropped In," all the music is perfect for the film. The plot, according to Wikipedia, which has been known to be wrong, is "loosely based on Raymond chandler's novel, The Big Sleep." Could be. But who cares. It involves a bowling competition, "the occasional acid flashback," a trophy wife, a group of German nihilists, a kidnapping gone awry, a mad millionaire and his lackey, in another great performance by Philip Seymour Hoffman. Actually, they're all great performances. Never a fan of John Goodman before or since, he is brilliant in this film. And so are John Turturro, overacting his little heart out, Steve Buscemi in a nerdy, needy role that makes you marvel at his star turn in Boardwalk Empire, and even the actors in the smaller parts, especially Julianne Moore and Sam Elliott. Elliott plays The Stranger (God? Everyman? The part of us that roots for the bad boy?) who elicits from Bridges the immortal words, "The Dude abides." Which prompts The Stranger to comment to the audience: "Don't know about you but I take comfort in that. It's good knowin' he's out there. The Dude. Takin' 'er easy for all us sinners. Shoosh. I sure hope he makes the finals." We'll never know about the bowling trophy because there's never been a sequel to this 1998 film by the great Coen Brothers, and I hope there never will be. It just abides, as all great films do.

Prince of the City:
Okay, the criticisms of this movie are not totally unfounded: it's too long, and Treat Williams may have overacted a bit, although I found him so deliciously charming I couldn't care less, and there's one part concerning the Jerry Orbach character I just didn't understand. But get over it, The New Yorker, this is one powerful movie. And yes, Dog Day Afternoon it isn't, but what it? The DVD has a great special feature with Williams (I so want to call him Treat) and Sidney (what the hell: I once made a meatloaf sandwich for the man) that explains a lot about filmmaking in general and this movie in particular. Also, Sidney's views on good and evil, and how things are not so black and white as you think. I loved it.

Bad Day At Black Rock:
Recommended on TCM by Robert Osbourne as a film he originally had no interest in seeing, then loved it, and by Alex Baldwin, who pointed out the great actors in the cast, including Lee Marvin, Ernest Brognine and Dean Jagger. Well, after all that, I had to like it, right?  I did. A lot. It was a Good Day On My Couch.
Behind the Scenes Stuff: Spencer Tracey was off drinking and wouldn't commit to the film until the producers (who wanted him desperately) told him that they had Alan Ladd, at which point Tracey grabbed it.  He was perfect for the part, wearing a dark suit and tie the entire time in a western setting,  pulling it off perfectly. Other than that "fashion statement," the film makes a strong case against racism: the hatred of the Japanese during WW2. See it.

Song of The Thin Man:
I usually like these frothy, silly, suave, utter unrealistic films from the 30s and 40s, with William Powell and Myrna Loy as the couple we'd all like to be — if only we had the looks, brains, money, a huge capacity for drinking and a dog like Asta. But this one was a stinker, rather than a stinger, or maybe a sinker, because  it turned out to be the last, not to mention the least, in the series. Watch any of the others four sequels, but not this one: Even the pooch jumped the shark.

The Children's Hour:
It had its moments, and just looking at Audrey Hepburn makes life worth living, but mostly I kept thinking that the play, by Lillian Hellman, was so much better. It's about two young women runing a school for girls, who are accused by a hateful little brat of being (GASP!) lesbians. And although the closest we get in this 1961 production to using that actual term is the word "unnatural," it's enough to ruin their lives.  A young Shirley McClaine is worth seeing in this, and James Garner, and Audrey Hepburn is, well, Audrey Hepburn. The rumor of the love that dare not speak its name is totally untrue — or is it? And I'll say no more, because you should see the movie for yourself, imperfect as it may be, as is Life Itself.

Because when I am not blogging, I sometimes cook,
and because woman does not live
by martinis alone,
I like this blog:

grapesandgreens.blogspot.com

To comment on
BITTER PATTER
Click on:
Welcome To My Blog


Scroll down to
PAT'S FAVORITES
for a blast
from the past.
rssfeedV2