Fri

25

Jun

2010

Are You Smarter Than Betty White?
Written by Pat Fortunato   
bettywhitered.jpg Nobody doesn't like Betty White.

Hell, she inspired an unprecedented Facebook campaign to get her on SNL, where she said — with wide eyes and perfect timing  — that before all this she didn't even know what Facebook was. And now that she does, it sounds like "a huge waste of time." 

She's saying worse things than that:
She blames technology and our "over-reliance on gadgets" for making people unable to play Password anymore.  CBS tried to revive the gameshow recently, upping the ante to Million Dollar Password. Well, inflation and all that.

Ms. White says that "kids today," and I take that to mean all of us, can't keep up with the fast pace of the game because we've created a generation who "can't think on their feet." In other words, unless we can look up the answers on Google we're dead.

  To those of you who actually are kids, Password was a really popular game show in the 60s and 0ddcouplepassword.jpg70s hosted by Betty's husband, Allen Ludden. A contestant would feed clues to a partner who'd try to guess the secret word.

Odd Couple Alert: there's a great episode called, appropriately, "Password" (Show #58, first aired in 1971), where Felix gives really weird clues like "Aristophanes" for "birds." Huh? Well it's clear to him: Aristophanes wrote a play called "The Birds." Everybody knows that. Really? Not the steamed and frustrated Oscar, who lost the game — to Betty White and her partner.

That was a long time ago, and 99.9% of the audience wouldn't have gotten the ancient Greek playwright/bird clue then either. Felix, the original metrosexual and know-it-all, was always more learned than the rest of us. But to Ms White's point: Is technology making us dumber?

I'm not so sure . . .

Maybe people can't play Password because they're not used to actually, like, you know, talking to each other.

But wait, that's mostly because of technology too, isn't it? It all started with television, when for the first time in recorded history people could spend hours staring at a tube without the annoyance of actually having a conversation. Well, before that you could sit around a campfire, but you'd probably break out into song at some point.

textingatdinner_1.jpgThese days you can and do text or confer with your Iphone (iPad or iDon'tknowwhatelse) while you're at dinner,  riding in a car, in your living room or anyplace else, so you can be with someone for hours at a stretch and pay no attention to your companion(s).

Playing Password requires interaction. With a (Gasp!) human. Could we do it? Betty may be right. We are pretty hooked on gadgets. Humans, not so much,.

I don't have any statistics on this, but I bet we're actually using fewer words these days too. After all, our favorite noun, verb, adjective, and adverb of choice seems to begin with f and end with uck. Get rid of that word and our vocabulary choices would dwindle down to a precious few, to quote a song from the distant, more literate past.

passwordvideo_1.jpgAnd see, words are important. They form thoughts. They allow us to communicate. They're good for song lyrics. They make us better at Password.

And if we'd learn to use words again, and you know, like, talk to each other, could we learn to play Password?

Would we get some respect from Betty White?
Nobody wouldn't like that.

SO:
ARE WE TOO DEPENDENT ON TECHNOLOGY?
ARE WE GETTING DUMBER?

W E IG H  I N  H E R E.





WE'RE ON YOU TUBE, TOO: www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvaxQfQgto0

 
This is a threaded commenting system. click [Reply to this comment] for your comment to be underneath the comment you're replying to.

Comments  

 
0 # Nancy Lombardi 2010-06-30 03:35
Very timely piece. There is a new book out about this subject called: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains. There is certainly a lot of truth to what Betty White said. Technology is great but not all of it is changing society for the better.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Pat Fortunato 2010-06-30 04:27
Hi, Nancy: The thing about technology is that you can't with it, you can't live without it! What annoys me is people on their computers, Ipads, Iphones, etc. when they should be talking to me!! The nerve.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Patty Drozd 2010-06-30 05:51
Wow! Good one! My nephews are in their early twenties now, and I can't remember a time when I was able to interact with one of them when he wasn't holding an electronic gadget, i.e., Game Boy all the way to Iphone.

I was beginning to take it personally, thinking I must be too boring to stimulate anyone to do or think anything.

Some years ago, I could also remember shopping in the produce aisle of a supermarket, and actually answering someone who asked me something about the cherries she was about to purchase. Today, I don't even look up, because I know that the other person is not addressing me, but speaking into a device.

And, is there anyone out there who could remember driving and looking into the rearview mirror to see the lone driver in the car behind talking and wildly gesticulating. That used to be called nuts. Alas, nuts is no more.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Pat Fortunato 2010-06-30 07:16
Patty: I'm sure that no one would ever accuse you of being boring! Your nephew would feel naked without an electronic gadget in his hand, and it's a plus if he talks to you at all. And I know what you mean about people walking around talking into their cells: for a long time, we thought they were talking to themselves, which is a sign of insanity. H'mm. One thing's for sure: driving while talking, gesticulating, or worse yet, texting, is definitely nuts!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # SUZAN 2010-07-01 10:36
Oh Please, Cant stand it anymore, my daughter wants to borrow our phone so she can text her friend to see if she wants to go to the movies,We ask her why she cant just pick up the phone and make the call and find out right away instead of waiting for another text to come in, and she replys because its faster. I ask faster for who??? This just re confirmes why I took texting off her phone the beginning of the school year because that is how she would be tallking to her friends in class instead of passing notes like the "old fashioned way".
I get my husband an ipod touch for his tunes, so when we are on a plane he can listen to something while he is sleeping...So he downloads 30 different apps
and it is glued to his hand almost 24 hrs a day even in bed I see the little light on while I am trying to sleep. Can you say solitaire??? Can someone say addiction?
Glad I didnt buy him something that makes noise.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Pat Fortunato 2010-07-02 04:37
Talk about Solataire! Someone else just told me the same story about her boyfriend who gets addicted to the latest gadget and goes into his own little world, leaving her alone even when he's there! Can we get Dr. Phil involved in this? Or is he too busy texting?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # SUZAN 2010-07-07 03:05
dont know Pat, maybe, but I shudder thinking that our phone contract is up this coming year and my husband wants the "DROID" which is like the I phone where you can get all these apps, so between this ipod touch and the new phone he wants I think I may be single again, maybe I should start looking for my next conquest???? I forgot how it is to be single again.uess I will be finding out if this new technology doesnt stop.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Pat Fortunato 2010-07-07 07:38
Susan: There should be a special dating service for cases like yours. Maybe there is.
WifiWidows.com?????
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Notify me of follow-up comments

Blog Roll

Comments

My site was nominated for Best Humor Blog!

Bitter Patter

NO LAUGHING MATTER:

Did Demi Moore overdose
on laughing gas?? 
That's what's being reported
to those of us at:

A DEVOUT COWARD 
GOES TO THE DENTIST

Have you seen The Artist? Seeing it mentioned at
The Golden Globes reminded me that that not ALL movies are 
Incredibly Loud! 

Do NOT Google Santorum.
I warned you . . .

 I did it!
I actually got that 

LITTLE BLACK DRESS!

How hard was it?
Click on the link above
.

I also got my iPhone.
It's great.
Thank you Steve Jobs
Wherever you are.

  Just as I posted I WAS THE GIRL PHANTOM, I found a website called The Ghost Who Blogs about The Phantom comics:

http://falkonthewildside.blogspot.com

Writing Comics. . .
Was a small but wonderful part of my checkered career, and doing a post about it  brought back a lot of great memories. If you know any other women in NYC who wrote — or are writing — comics, tell me how to get in touch with them. 

I'm on a watching-old-movies kick these days.
Great way to lose yourself.
If you're lucky, you'll never be found. 

REVIEWS TO PERUSE

I'm All Right, Jack:
"Jack" is not just all right, it's totally delightful and fresh as a daisy after all these years (made in 1959), with Sellers, although not technically the lead, giving the brilliant performance that launched him as an international star. He plays an all-too-zealous union leader and father of a blonde bombshell who falls for Stanley, the British Upper Class Twit played, also to perfection, by Ian Carmichael, who you might remember from the Lord Peter Wimsey series. The makeout scenes between the the Twit and the Bombshell are priceless. But what is Stanley doing in this working class atmosphere anyway? Working. And too well at that. Forced by financial circumstances too dreary to discuss, he gets a job in his uncle's factory and messes things up for the other workers by, well, working, and thus making his fellow employees look bad. The film takes a big shot at unions — but also at management: they are manipulating white-collar thieves who'll do anything for a buck. Or a pound. Except for the ones, like Major Hitchcock, played by Terry Thomas, who are just plain lazy and inept. Needless to say, Stanley foils everybody's plans, labor and management alike, to my great joy and delight. Oh, and on top of everything else, Margaret Rutherford plays dotty dowager Aunt Dolly. Delicious!

 The Big Lebowski:
What can you say that hasn't been said before: brilliant, inspired, with some of the most memorable lines ever to come out of a movie, the most quoted being "The Dude abides." Oh yes. For anyone who hasn't yet seen the film, and it's now out in a special Blu-Ray edition if that floats your bowling ball. The Dude in question,  played to perfection by Jeff Bridges, is an out-of-work pothead who is roughed up and has his rug destroyed by some thugs mistaking him for another, bigger, Lebowski. The Dude is really upset about this because, man, "that rug really tied the room together," which The Dude says with all seriousness and not a trace of irony, a great comic touch considering the condition his condition is in.  Oh, and besides "Just Dropped In," all the music is perfect for the film. The plot, according to Wikipedia, which has been known to be wrong, is "loosely based on Raymond chandler's novel, The Big Sleep." Could be. But who cares. It involves a bowling competition, "the occasional acid flashback," a trophy wife, a group of German nihilists, a kidnapping gone awry, a mad millionaire and his lackey, in another great performance by Philip Seymour Hoffman. Actually, they're all great performances. Never a fan of John Goodman before or since, he is brilliant in this film. And so are John Turturro, overacting his little heart out, Steve Buscemi in a nerdy, needy role that makes you marvel at his star turn in Boardwalk Empire, and even the actors in the smaller parts, especially Julianne Moore and Sam Elliott. Elliott plays The Stranger (God? Everyman? The part of us that roots for the bad boy?) who elicits from Bridges the immortal words, "The Dude abides." Which prompts The Stranger to comment to the audience: "Don't know about you but I take comfort in that. It's good knowin' he's out there. The Dude. Takin' 'er easy for all us sinners. Shoosh. I sure hope he makes the finals." We'll never know about the bowling trophy because there's never been a sequel to this 1998 film by the great Coen Brothers, and I hope there never will be. It just abides, as all great films do.

Prince of the City:
Okay, the criticisms of this movie are not totally unfounded: it's too long, and Treat Williams may have overacted a bit, although I found him so deliciously charming I couldn't care less, and there's one part concerning the Jerry Orbach character I just didn't understand. But get over it, The New Yorker, this is one powerful movie. And yes, Dog Day Afternoon it isn't, but what it? The DVD has a great special feature with Williams (I so want to call him Treat) and Sidney (what the hell: I once made a meatloaf sandwich for the man) that explains a lot about filmmaking in general and this movie in particular. Also, Sidney's views on good and evil, and how things are not so black and white as you think. I loved it.

Bad Day At Black Rock:
Recommended on TCM by Robert Osbourne as a film he originally had no interest in seeing, then loved it, and by Alex Baldwin, who pointed out the great actors in the cast, including Lee Marvin, Ernest Brognine and Dean Jagger. Well, after all that, I had to like it, right?  I did. A lot. It was a Good Day On My Couch.
Behind the Scenes Stuff: Spencer Tracey was off drinking and wouldn't commit to the film until the producers (who wanted him desperately) told him that they had Alan Ladd, at which point Tracey grabbed it.  He was perfect for the part, wearing a dark suit and tie the entire time in a western setting,  pulling it off perfectly. Other than that "fashion statement," the film makes a strong case against racism: the hatred of the Japanese during WW2. See it.

Song of The Thin Man:
I usually like these frothy, silly, suave, utter unrealistic films from the 30s and 40s, with William Powell and Myrna Loy as the couple we'd all like to be — if only we had the looks, brains, money, a huge capacity for drinking and a dog like Asta. But this one was a stinker, rather than a stinger, or maybe a sinker, because  it turned out to be the last, not to mention the least, in the series. Watch any of the others four sequels, but not this one: Even the pooch jumped the shark.

The Children's Hour:
It had its moments, and just looking at Audrey Hepburn makes life worth living, but mostly I kept thinking that the play, by Lillian Hellman, was so much better. It's about two young women runing a school for girls, who are accused by a hateful little brat of being (GASP!) lesbians. And although the closest we get in this 1961 production to using that actual term is the word "unnatural," it's enough to ruin their lives.  A young Shirley McClaine is worth seeing in this, and James Garner, and Audrey Hepburn is, well, Audrey Hepburn. The rumor of the love that dare not speak its name is totally untrue — or is it? And I'll say no more, because you should see the movie for yourself, imperfect as it may be, as is Life Itself.

Because when I am not blogging, I sometimes cook,
and because woman does not live
by martinis alone,
I like this blog:

grapesandgreens.blogspot.com

To comment on
BITTER PATTER
Click on:
Welcome To My Blog


Scroll down to
PAT'S FAVORITES
for a blast
from the past.
rssfeedV2